Author: Sonia Brugger Page 1 of 2

The End

While it hasn’t been six months quite yet I have finished my internship early due to the wonderful new career oppertunity I have.  I have been selected for the University of Hawaii Marine Technician position.  

These past few months have been amazing. I have learned so many things and have finally reached my career goal of being hired as a marine technician.  I would like to thank everyone who has given me the oppertunity to learn under them and help me progress.  

So…to the interns out there who have actually decided that this is a job they want to pursue…always make sure to learn. Push yourself. Make connections whether it be scientists, crew, or other technicians.  They can be some of your biggest allies.  Use every resource available: Linkedin, RVTech, UNOLS, email…things may look down, chances are you will get interviews and then told how you don’t have enough experpience…trust me..I’ve lost count of how many places have told me that. Eventually you’ll get that amazing call back. Just keep swimming. Things will always work out.

 

Anyways, this is Sonia Brugger.  Checking out.

Back to Corvallis

It’s been approximately a month since I left for San Diego.  Since then I have completed a mooring deployment cruise and a sediment coring/imaging cruise.  I must say it’s been a busy month and It feels rather strange to be back on shore.  

While I am back I will have to head to our Newport storage facility to pick up some items for my next cruise (spare PMI grips, sensors, etc) and I will continue to try and solve my Triaxus problem.  

After the Healy

Brief update since my Shakedown cruise on the Healy.

– Successfully completed the full inventory on all of the Triaxus boxes that OSU received from Moss Landing.  Meaning that I will be able to start work on the rebuild during my next period of shore leave.  Still not 100% sure where to even start on this project since we appear to have a lot of spare and broken parts. As well as the fact the Triaxus was supposedly customized by the Applied Physics Lab at the University of Washington….and the documentation is missing.  It’s almost like buying a puzzle at the Goodwill and discovering you are missing the crucial boarder pieces.  Luckily I still have the original MacArtney documentation as well as access to some great resources if I need to ask questions. 

 

-Mooring deployment cruise.  Completed a week long mooring deployment cruise for a Naval research group.  Their custom “Quadpods” and ADCP/Temperature moorings will be used to monitor sediment transport along the seabed.  Overall the cruise went well, we finished all the deployments in two days.  

 

-Coring cruise.  As of 0800 this morning we shipped out of San Francisco to begin a sediment coring cruise with a private research group based out of Washington.  This seems like it will be an interesting cruise, albeit a lot of work due to the 24hr ops.  Since the Oceanus only runs one technician generally, true 24 hr ops are not really possibly.  However for this cruise one of the science technicians will spilt a 12hr shift with our marine technician (noon-midnight, midnight-noon) and I will be running from 6am-6pm in order to maintain clear communications between our science party and crew.  

Quick update

Been awhile since my last detailed post, but time flies and I’ve been way too busy to even muster the urge to type anything useful.  

This last week I had the fortune to work aboard the USCGC Healy for a 4 day shakedown cruise.  The goal of a shakedown cruise is to get all of the science and technical aspects working since the ship had been sitting essentially unused for a few months.  Dusting off the cobwebs on computer based systems are always fun because they always seem to turn on with new issues. Overall our cruise went well, with the main exception being the 4 hour delay due to engine failure before we left the dock.  Our main issues revolved around the Met System that displays the flow through information, the multibeam, and the CTD.  

On the cruise I learned and practiced many useful techniques.  Its amazing how every technician you meet has a different way of doing things, a prime example being CTD terminations.  On the shakedown cruise my OSU tech coworker and I got to work with some awesome Scripps technicians since the Healy shipboard tech support group is made up of a collaboration of OSU and Scripps (STARC) and the Coast Guard’s MSTs and ESUs.  Overall it was a great experience.  

As for present day.  I am currently back in Corvallis Oregon working in our office space.  I am still inventorying the multiple boxes of Triaxus related gear before I can even think about piecing it together. However I only have till Sunday before I fly off to meet the R/V Oceanus for a month at sea.  I am hoping my coworker starts to feel better otherwise I may be the lead marine tech running this upcoming cruise.  It would be entertaining and fun to run the cruise for sure, but I still have to read over the cruise plan and expected science to be completed. 

 

From parts to product

During my 6-month internship I will be working on rebuilding a MacArtney Trixaxus.  I am absolutly thrilled to have the oppertunity to help my ship regain an extremely useful piece of equipment, however I am also somewhat terrified as all of those boxes contain random parts, cables, and electronics that I don’t quite undersatnd at this point.  

The above image was taken on the R/V Point Sur and stolen from Wikipedia.  

As for what a Triaxus is….I’ll leave the description to the MacArtney website article: 

 Adding a new dimension to towed vehicles, the TRIAXUS is the natural step forward from the existing 2D towed vehicle technology to a true 3D towfish. The TRIAXUS uses state of the art computer technology and fibre optic telemetry for vehicle and sensor communication.

The TRIAXUS features flaps for vertical as well as lateral control. A powerful industrial PC controls the vehicle based on input from the onboard vehicle control sensors according to the preprogrammed flight path.

The TRIAXUS is developed for high-speed oceanographic data acquisition work, and is designed to undulate between 1 and 350 metres*. Lateral offsets of up to 80 metres to either side of the ship is possible, enabling the vertical profiling to be carried out in an undisturbed water column.

Towing speed* between 1 and 10 knots and vertical speed* of up to 1 metre per second are possible. The TRIAXUS has been designed using the latest carbon fibre moulding technologies and the Danish Maritime Institute (DMI) has supplied the hydrodynamic design. The embedded telemetry system is based on the successful NEXUS fibre optic multiplexer system, allowing interface of up to 9 additional sensor packages using the Plug and Play principle.”

Understanding Wire and Rope (Part 1) – Wire

As an intern on the R/V Oceanus I have had the pleasure of watching experienced marine technicians not only work on deck but also work on cruise planning logistics in the office.  On my last internship I never had the ability to see how cruises were actually planned and how marine technicians worked through logistical issues with the science party.  What I have witnessed is both amazing and slightly daunting to a new technician.  A constant flow of emails with questions and concerns are often waiting for us each morning, and it can be frustrating as you must research whether or not a scientist’s supplied gear will work on your vessel.  If the gear the science party wants is not personally supplied then you must look into the different UNOLS equipment pools.  Two of the pools I am quickly coming familiar with are NORCOR operated by OSU and the West Coast Winch Pool operated by Scripps.  NORCOR primarily offers coring and dredging gear for the UNOLS fleet while the West Coast Winch Pool offers various winches and spoolers.

            While planning a cruise a marine technician and chief scientist must assess what sort of winch and wire, if any, are needed for their operations.  Currently the Oceanus is outfitted with two small starboard winches (DESH-5 and COM-15 models) and one stern winch (Dynacon HT).  Generally there are four standard categories of oceanographic cables, trawl, hydrographic, electro-mechanical/CTD, and fiber optic.  Below is a chart of the general characteristics:

 

Trawl

Hydro

E-M/CTD

Fiber Optic

Size

9/16”

1/4″

.322”

.681”

Construction

3 x 19 galv.

3 x 19 galv.

2 armor galv.

3 armor galv.

R.B.S

32,500 lbs.

6,750 lbs.

11,600 lbs.

46,000 lbs.

Yield

24,375 lbs.

5,063 lbs.

5,000 lbs.

2% Yield

28,600 lbs.

5,900 lbs.

S.W.L

14,300 lbs.

2,950 lbs.

4,500 lbs.

14,000 lbs.

 

Below are three figures showing the internal slice of the Trawl, E-M, and Fiber Optic wires. I was unable to find a diagram of the 1/4 “ Hydrographic wire. 

 

Trawl wire and hydrographic wire are both generally used on the aft winch as a means of deploying and/or towing various scientific insturments.  Trawl wire (9/16″) is used for heavier objects due to it’s size and breaking strength while hydrographic wire (1/4″) is used for smaller applications. 

Figure 1. Construction diagram of the 9/16” 3 x 19 Trawl Wire and the 1/4″ 3 x 19 hydrographic wire. All UNOLS 3×19 wire rope are torque balanced, meaning that the rope resists rotation and on the sudden release of the load will not kink or form loops.  They also have a higher strength to weight ratio when compared to conventional 6-strand rope.  

 

The .322″ E-M cable is used for various insturments, most commonly a CTD (conductivity, temperature, depth sensor), as its internal electrical conductors, made of copper, allows data transmission to happen between an insturments and its deck box.  This allows for functions such as real time variable profiles (exp: CTD display of temperature, salinity, depth) as well as triggering an insutrment to open/close (exp: closing of a niskan bottle on a rosette). 

Figure 2.  Construction diagram of the .322” Electro-mechanical/CTD cable

 

The .681″ Fiber optic cable is simialr in a way to the EM cable due to the fact it is also used to trasmit data back and forth from an insturment to a deck box with the exception that it uses thin strands of coated glass fibers instead of copper conductors. To transmit data information is digitized and coded onto light pulses whcih travel along the glass fiber at the speed of light.  Once it reaches it’s destination a decoder coverts the information back into a useable format. Due to this process it is much more effiecent then copper conductors. A notable example of its use is in the deployment of ROV’s such as ROV Jason on the WHOI ships.  These fiber optic cables allow the ship to send commands to Jason as well as recieve the data and images that the ROV captures.  

 

Figure 3. Construction diagram of the .681” Fiber Optic cable

Currently the R/V Oceanus only has two types of wire on board, the .322” E-M and the 9/16” 3×9 Trawl wire.  However both .680 E-M and .681 Fiber optic cables are available if requested. 

Breaking Loads

When it comes to working with wire two of the most important considerations to keep in mind are breaking loads and the safe working load.  Breaking loads are separated into three categories (definitions are from the UNOLS Appendix A):

-Nominal Breaking Load (NBL): Manufacturer’s minimum published breaking load for a rope or cable.

-Tested Breaking Load (TBL): The actual load required to pull a tension member to destruction as determined by testing.

-Assigned Breaking Load (ABL): Will be the lowest of the Nominal Breaking Load and Tested Breaking Load. In practice, ABL = NBL unless testing shows the TBL < NBL.

The Safe Working Load is the maximum load that is allowed to be supported during normal operation.  It is derived from the Able Working load (ABL) and a Factor of Safety (FS), the Factor of Safety is selected by the operator based on rules set by the UNOLS Appendix A.  So:  SWL = AWL / FS 

 

In order to determine the Test Breaking Load (TBL) of a wire the UNOLS ship is required to send a sample of their wire to the WHOI Wire pool.  There they will conduct a tensile test using either fixed ends or one end free to rotate (depending on the requirments of the wire).  After the sample wire is broken the ship will recieve a certifiation of testing report showing the breaking features of the wire. Below is an example test certification:

 

Depending on the results of the break testing and the Factor of Safety selected for the wire, testing could be required every 6 month, annually, or every 2 years.  

 

Overall this has probably been a very technical and in some ways confusing blog post.  However this is the nature of the marine technician buisness. Understanding the basic concepts of the tools given to you, as well as the guidelines setforth by the fleet and home institutions (UNOLS Appendix A) can allow you to be a better safer technician. Plus…where’s the fun in all of this stuff if it wasn’t a little confusing? Life would be boring if it was always so straightforward. 

 

Next Post: Understanding Wire and Rope (Part 2) – Rope

Oregon Coast Marine Life

 

Ocean Observatories Initiative Cruise

Date: 4/2/2015

Time: 17:00

Location: Newport, Oregon

  Cruise: 03d – Dever – Ocean Observatories Initiative (OOI)

  Project summary –

            The Ocean Observatories Initiative is essentially the biggest and some may suggest the most important work currently underway in the field of oceanography for this decade.  With a $386 million network of cabled sensors, moorings, seafloor installations, and autonomous vehicles the OOI project is attempting to create a fully integrated system for the collection of oceanographic data on coastal, regional and global scales.  This project is lead by the Consortium for Ocean Leadership and has five major components that separate universities have spearheaded. Below is a list summarizing the universities and their active roles in this project. Figure 1 provides a map of the array and node locations for reference:

 

1) Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution + Scripps Institution of Oceanography

            – Pioneer and Global Arrays, including moorings and autonomous vehicles

2) Oregon State University

            -Endurance Array moorings and autonomous vehicles

3) University of Washington

            -Regional cabled seafloor systems and moorings

4) University of California, San Diego

            – Cyberinfrastructure

5) Rutgers University + University of Maine + Raytheon Mission Operations and Services (An American Defense contractor known for their work with weapon, military, and commercial electronics)

            -Education and public engagement software infrastructure

 

*Image may not show on certain browsers. Compatible browsers appear to be Safari and Internet Explorer 

Figure 1. Map of the Coastal and Global Scale Nodes final design concept. It shows the locations of the four Global Arrays, the Endurance Array, and Pioneer Array. The Endurance Array has elements connected to the Regional Scale Nodes (insert). Map provided by the OOI website.

For my internship I was granted the opportunity to work with the Oregon State University OOI group for the construction and deployment of the Endurance Array moorings.  Essentially the Endurance Array consists of two mooring lines, the Oregon – Newport and Washington – Grays Harbor lines. These lines contain three fixed depth sites, the slope (~500-600 m), shelf (~80-90 m), and inner-shelf (~25-30 m ) and some components are connected to the Cabled Array that the University of Washington leads. On top of moorings the Endurance Array also consists of six gliders. Figure 2 is a detailed map of the Endurance Array system.

 

*Image may not show on certain browsers. Compatible browsers appear to be Safari and Internet Explorer 

Figure 2. Map of the Endurance Array showing the Oregon and Washington mooring lines. Also shown are the connections to the Regional Scale Node cabled infrastructure (at 80 m and 500 m sites) as well as the glider flight paths. Map provided by the OOI website.

Log

            Today was the first day of sailing for the 03d cruise. Originally we were supposed to set sail on April 1st but multiple factors prevented this from happening. Due to the tremendous size of these moorings we have to carefully consider the sea state and equipment being used to deploy the gear.  While we had relatively calm seas on the 1st we discovered that our Heavy Lift Winch (HLW – a specially designed winch built just to handle these buoys) was having multiple issues.  The first is that its use appeared to be creating an unsafe energy surge in the ships generator. Luckily the ships engineers were able to fix the issue (though I’m unsure what they did). The second issue that we came across was a hysteresis problem.  Once we had solved all of our HLW problems we were able to load the ship with our first buoy.

            Overall the deployment of the buoy went all right but it could definitely be labeled as stressful.  One wrong move and it would not just be an expensive instrument on the line but more importantly someone’s life.   Due to this being my first major cruise I sat back for the deployment to watch and understand the overall operation.  Due to the calm weather we were able to take the deployment nice and slow, so over the period of an hour we had finally deployed the whole setup without any issues.  For the most part the only scary part of this deployment was getting the actually buoy over the side and trying to keep it under control.  We had used all the available points for tag lines but it would have benefitted to have more to keep it in control when it got in the air and over the side as it had started to swing quite a bit before we could get it in the water.  Figures 3, 4, and 5 show the buoy and its connected parts.

            Once we had completed the Mooring deployment we moved on to retrieving a small “surface piercing profiler (SPP)”.  During this operation I actually got to help as I ran the A-frame under the direction of our AB Doug.  After we completed the retrieval we headed back to the dock for the night and are currently loading the next mooring as I type.  Overall this cruise is off to a decent start. 

*Image may not show on certain browsers. Compatible browsers appear to be Safari and Internet Explorer 

Figure 3. Concept drawing for the Endurance shelf mooring consisting of the buoy (2), NSIF Instrument configuration assembly (1), HIB Module (6), and Multi functioning node/anchor (MFN- not numbered).  All parts are connected by EM Chain (5, 12) and stretch hose (4). Diagram provided by OOI.

Figure 4. Surface Buoy Assembly

Figure 5.  Full mooring setup being tested, attached buoy is for the inshore sites.

Figure 6. Deployment of the 80 m Shelf buoy. 

3..2..1..Start

Date: 3/25/2015

Time: 20:58

Location: Corvallis, Oregon

 

Quick introduction

 

            Greetings to the few people that will probably glance over this blog post, my name is Sonia Brugger and I am the 2015 6-month MATE intern. A brief background about myself: I graduated from the University of Washington in June 2014 with a degree in Oceanography as well as Aquatic Fishery Sciences. I have spent time on the R/V Thompson, Barnes, and New Horizon as well as having had the pleasure of spending July-October of 2014 on the R/V Savannah for my short term MATE internship.  Overall the majority of my past cruise experiences have been focused around biological and physical oceanography.

 

Log

 

            It has been four days since I officially started my internship.  The first two days consisted of checking into my housing as well as meeting the new hire for the OSU Marine Tech pool.  On Sunday Rob (the new hire) and I drove down to Newport, OR where the R/V Oceanus is stationed to meet the crew and tour the ship.

 

            Monday was my first day of actual work. Since the ship was leaving for a 4-day cruise starting Tuesday morning I spent a short portion of my day helping load gear, which consisted of a large amount of geological sampling instruments (grab sampler, gravity/piston corer, box corer).  With the loading completed I learned how to terminate the .322 CTD wire and calibrated the tension sensor through load testing.  There were also other small projects that I helped the other techs with such as installing sensors to the CTD package, putting up a bench in the wetlab for the science party, and troubleshooting the fluorometer.  Overall it was a long day, around 14hours including the hour-long drive from our tech shop in Corvallis to the dock in Newport.

 

            Today was relatively tame compared to Monday.  Rob and I drove to Newport in the morning to bring over some paperwork and help the tech Johna with any last minute things before her cruise left.  Overall there wasn’t much to finish up other then making sure the cables on the CTD package were ziptied and we didn’t leave any unnecessary gear on the ship.  Afterwards we headed back to Corvallis to meet with the OOI (Ocean Observatories Initiative) group that would be sailing with us next week.  We sat in a cruise plan meeting and got to check out all of their buoys/moorings.  It was pretty exciting and yet rather unnerving to know that will be my first cruise as a marine technician on the R/V Oceanus.  The OOI project is one of the biggest and probably could be considered as one of the most important projects currently going on in the oceanography community.  The buoys that we will be deploying and retrieving are some of the largest ones built which makes them extremely difficult in a deck operation standpoint.  As marine technicians for this project we will have to get one of our techs trained in the operation of a special heavy lifting winch that will be installed on the ship Saturday and is the only thing capable of working with the massive equipment.  Overall it has been a thrilling start to my internship. I’ve already learned a lot of useful things and met some great people. 

 

 

The End…for now

The bags are packed, the flight is booked, and the goodbyes have been said.  Its time to return to Seattle after being gone since July.  I’m somewhat sad of my departure but I know that good things are going to come along.  

My time on the R/V Savannah have been some of the best I’ve ever had.  I met some great people and got to help support amazing scientific goals.  It is an experience that I will never forget.  

While I haven’t had much luck on the job search so far, I have found a few marine technician positions to apply to…So hopefully in the near future I will be able to call myself an actual marine technician.  I am very glad I got to enjoy this awesome internship.

 

 

 

Page 1 of 2

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén